Fwd: [se-ed] Discussion: Aligning Pre-Service Teacher Education to the National Curriculum Framework 2005. Reply by 20 January 2010

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Naaz Khair <naazkhair@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [se-ed] Discussion: Aligning Pre-Service Teacher
Education to the National Curriculum Framework 2005. Reply by 20
January 2010
To: Education Community <se-ed@solutionexchange-un.net.in>

Dear Friends,

Hopefully in the near future as per RTE timelines we should have the
desired number of teachers in place in the government schools. And,
based on my field experience I do hope that these also consist of
subject teachers where we require them. I strongly feel that subject
teachers are needed from Class-3-4 onwards because that is when the
subject foundation is built.
Further, while for many, math and science are traditionally difficult
subjects to teach and learn, I have learnt from field experience that
social sciences and language also require very strong and motivated
teachers. English has been introduced in the government schools and
there is a major demand for English learning among the students but
the standard of English teaching in the government schools (covered
under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan) is pathetic.
Moreover, I have heard Arts teachers in senior secondary government
schools in a particular State complaining about lack of basic
conceptual knowledge in geography among elementary students joining
secondary school. This could be true for other social science subjects
as well. Sometimes the textbooks are at fault and sometimes teachers
cannot teach the subject assigned to them. Many teachers with an Arts
background cannot teach math at the primary level.
Based on the above issues, can we look at pre-service teacher training
producing subject teachers? Further, graduate and post graduate
students with specific subject specializations opting for teaching in
primary schools must be oriented to function at the level of small
children. Senior secondary school pass-outs going in for pre-service
teacher training adapt better in the primary schools.
Somewhere pre-service teacher training should also prepare the
students to work in the interior parts of the Country. Given the bulk
of our regular government schools are located here.
Needless to say that prospective teachers must be trained to feel
equally duty bound to teach poor SC, ST, Minority, Girls,
Differently-Abled, Migrant and First Generation learners i.e. all the
educationally excluded children. Each of these learner categories has
its unique learning needs.
All of the above is emphasized over and above some good things already
happening under pre-service teacher training (e.g. training in new
teaching-learning methods viz. activity /material based teaching,
small group learning etc) but not happening on the ground. Perhaps a
good school experience program would give prospective teachers the
desired confidence to translate these and other pre-service training
into sustainable practice on the ground.
Finally, in terms of reacting to the issue raised in the query
regarding whether there should be separate primary and upper primary
teacher cadres, in my opinion they should be separate. It will
introduce a certain rigor in all aspects relating to teacher at
primary level, similarly with regard to teachers at upper primary
level. Currently, the situation is very fluid- E.g. A teacher promoted
to the upper primary level in many cases is not a good subject
teacher. Or, a certain teacher at the primary level is better
qualified to teach at the upper primary level.
Thank you and regards,
Naaz Khair
Independent Consultant
New Delhi.
________________________________
From: Hrydayakant Diwan [mailto:vbsudr@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 3:57 PM
To: 'Education Community'
Subject: [se-ed] Discussion: Aligning Pre-Service Teacher Education to
theNational Curriculum Framework 2005. Reply by 20 January 2010
Moderator's Note: Dear Members, A very happy new year to all of you!
We are beginning the year with the discussion on Pre- Service Teacher
Education which plays a very important role in shaping the future
teachers'. All of us would agree that teachers, as one of the
important pillars of the whole educational process, require training,
capacity enhancement and other inputs which enable them to undertake
their teaching responsibilities with a sense of empowerment. Teacher
education whether pre- service or in service is the opportunity for
teachers to understand and reflect on some of the critical concepts,
gain knowledge on teaching – learning methodologies and above all
learn to understand children better.
Many of us feel that 'what should be taught to the children' is to be
re-looked at in view of the needs of today. The purpose and role of
education also need to be re-articulated. Accordingly, teacher
education processes need to be re-visioned, revised and reformulated
to respond to the challenges of the present times. Right to Education
Act is to be kept in mind while preparing teachers' for future. In the
context of the above, this discussion holds immense importance.
We are happy to announce that Hridya Kant Diwan, a well known
Educationist and presently Education Advisor, Vidya Bhavan Society
Udaipur, has agreed to become the Guest Moderator for this discussion.
He has been one of the articulate voices on Education System reforms
in all its dimensions and has contributed significantly with his
innovative thoughts and ideas on the issues and concerns on teacher
education in the country. He has also been part of the process of
development of NCF 2005.
We are sure with Hardy as Guest Moderator, this discussion would be
helpful in bringing about reforms in the field of teacher education in
the country.
Shubhangi
________________________________
Dear Friends,
An International Conference on Teacher Development and Management was
organized at Vidya Bhawan Udaipur from February 23-25, 2009 with the
technical support of Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD),
the National Council for Educational Research and Training (NCERT),
the National University of Educational Planning and Administration
(NUEPA) and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE).  The
important ideas that emerged from this conference include the need for
a comprehensive policy and implementation strategy for teacher
education with earmarked resources; aligning teacher education
programs (pre-service and in-service) to the National Curriculum
Framework – 2005 and an institution focused comprehensive professional
development plan for teachers.  As a follow-up of the Udaipur
conference, a series of seminars are planned to discuss various issues
emerged out of the conference.  The first seminar on theme 'Aligning
pre-service Elementary teacher education to the NCF, 2005 in the
context of the National Curricular Framework for teacher Education and
the Right to Education (RTE) Act' will be held at NCERT, New Delhi,
and February 2-4, 2010.
One key need from teachers is to transact inclusively and use the
socio-cultural diversity and multi-linguality as a resource and not
view it as a hindrance. Pre-service preparation of teachers must
demand greater effort and learning and not be a mere certification
ritual. The preparation of the elementary teacher has to recognise
that she is expected to be able to form a sensitive and caring respect
for the child, believe in her ability to learn and have the
preparedness to engage with her. Besides this she has also to help
children develop conceptual understanding in Maths and Environmental
Science and assist them in development of the capability to use all
forms of language. It is clear that this requires a realisation of the
aims and goals of education, the way children learn and as pointed out
above sensitivity and understanding of their backgrounds. The 'would
be' teachers need an understanding of the nature of the disciplines
and how they develop. The present teacher preparation syllabi,
transaction processes, assessment and school experience mechanisms,
preparation and background of teacher educators needs to be examined
and possible components of the way forward based on current
experiences evolved.
For example the classrooms in the teacher preparation classes need to
show the engagement and participation that is expected from the
teachers in the school. They need the space to explore, articulate,
discuss, experiment, use their experiences and develop the interest
and the ability to continue to learn on their own. Similarly the
school experience program, a critical component of the preparation,
needs to be analysed in the light of the severe criticism its
assumptions and procedures have met with on many forums. The
alternatives being explored need to be shared and considered to evolve
possible principles of the way forward.
There are concerns about the status and salaries of teachers, their
appraisal mechanisms and motivations. We need to reflect on these as
well and abstract the key issues that affect them. Besides all this
the pre-service education of teachers requires teacher educators that
have the ability to provide such experiences to teachers' that make
them aware and capable. We must also remember that teacher has to work
within the ambience of the system; she requires an administrative
system that would allow her and all other teachers to share and
explore their ideas, reflect on their experiences and be creative. The
main aspects of the current system have to be critically analysed
against this requirement.
The issues of the widely differing quality of the multiplicity of
courses needs to be considered even though variety and plurality may
not be bad idea in itself; there are concerns about the need for
upgrading teacher pre-service education by enhancing the duration of
training and making it equivalent to degree program and placing of
teacher education programs in a professional body of University
faculty are also critical concerns.
This is particularly important in the context of the large number of
teachers required to meet the expectations arising out of the RTE. The
RTE being till elementary classes and the current form of syllabus for
the later part of the elementary school, particularly classes VI to
VIII expects fairly abstract ideas to be transacted.
In the light of the above following questions are also pertinent
·         Do we require subject teachers at this stage? Should
pre-service elementary teachers be prepared and chosen as subject
specialist teachers. Should there be a common cadre of teachers' for
primary and higher classes of the elementary school OR there should be
two or more cadres? What capabilities do these teachers require?
·         What should be the process of assessment and criteria for
deciding if an aspiring person is adequately prepared,
·         What are the kinds of facilities available to the aspiring
teachers etc. What should be the possible mechanisms for this and what
have been the experiences from the efforts in this direction.
·         What could be the alternative forms of School Experience
program for teachers.
·         Who can be teacher educators, what capability and attitudes
they need to have and the kind of institutions should prepare
teachers.
We request Members of the Education Community to critically examine
and bring in experiences from all around for reflection and learning
to align pre- service education with NCF in the context of RTE Act
responding to the questions stated above. Members' experiences, advice
would be a significant contribution in the proposed seminar on Pre
Service Education thereby embarking on an enabling Teacher education
and management policy in the country.
Hriday Kant Diwan
Vidya Bhawan Society
Udaipur

--
Ch.Santakar
Pujariput
Koraput-764020
Orissa
Mob:09437192553
e-mail:santakar@gmail.com
web:www.koraputonline.com